Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Considera username único no banco de dados ignorando capitalização #1791

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

Rafatcb
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rafatcb Rafatcb commented Sep 4, 2024

Mudanças realizadas

Conforme discutido no PR #1790, essa alteração é uma garantia extra de que usuários duplicados não serão inseridos no banco de dados.

Checklist:

  • As modificações não geram novos logs de erro ou aviso (warning).
  • Eu adicionei testes que provam que a correção ou novo recurso funciona conforme esperado.
  • Tanto os novos testes quanto os antigos estão passando localmente.

…n database

In the backend it is already validated that the `username` is unique ignoring the case; now this is
also validated in the database.
@Rafatcb Rafatcb added the back Envolve modificações no backend label Sep 4, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 4, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
tabnews ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 4, 2024 11:32pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@aprendendofelipe aprendendofelipe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tudo certo em homologação! 🎉

Bora para produção! 🚀

@aprendendofelipe aprendendofelipe merged commit a67be7f into main Sep 5, 2024
7 checks passed
@aprendendofelipe aprendendofelipe deleted the fix/validate-lower-username-db branch September 5, 2024 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
back Envolve modificações no backend
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants