-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement: Internal Bridge angle override #7908
Enhancement: Internal Bridge angle override #7908
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and it seems to be working without any issues.
How close is this to finally being merged? Desperately waiting for them to hit the nightly build. |
You can use them today if you want from the build artefacts here, or if you want a more complete build including some more PRs that are currently in review feel free to use my dev branch temporarily till the reviews are done. https://github.com/igiannakas/OrcaSlicer/actions/runs/13091477443 |
Thank you @igiannakas |
Me neither / typically the auto direction works very well but from the raised issues it appears that there are some niche cases where it may be needed. Let’s see :) |
Yes there are some cases, for example when the bridging area is curved, moon like ☪️ . Thank you |
Give the latest nightly a go and offer feedback if this addresses your issue :) |
@SoftFever @igiannakas I've just been having a problem with this and looked in to whether this had already been reported - what timing! Here's an example of where manual control would help me. You can see that on the left side of the image, the bridging direction makes sense but on the bottom it's pretty suboptimal. I could overcome this with more sparse infill underneath but this part doesn't need any real strength in the Z direction so being able to manually choose the direction should help me save some print time and material. I'll get the latest nightly and give it a go.
|
Yes indeed the latest nightly should address this case. Please let me know if it doesn’t work… |
Indeed I couldn’t get the modifier to work on a part covered surface as the bridge polygons are generated in one go and I don’t believe respect part covered modifiers. I may be wrong but for now it will do…The alternative would be to completely block it from modifiers but then part of the usefulness would be gone so kept it even with a partially functioning modifier capability. I’ll correct the typo in the other PR I currently have open for bridging to avoid creating more work for soft fever |
Description
Enable overriding of the auto calculated internal bridge angle for cases where the automated algorithm fails to produce adequate bridging results.
Set to 0 (default) to disable (retain the automated calculation).
Fixes #2186
Screenshots/Recordings/Graphs
Default
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f3c5/9f3c546ca098f347de1fb424e974e2d74d2e1b7d" alt="image"
Override:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34f2b/34f2bf9a2e4f4b3d6e347bf367619ba6a428722d" alt="image"
Tests
@Noisyfox would welcome your thoughts please on point 3. When placing a modifier it segments the region correctly but it ignores the angle provided. Unfortunately I am not very familiar with this (quite complex) code so will end up breaking something if I interfere more :) any pointers on where to look for this would be greatly appreciated :)